Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41394381›Full record

ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences2025

Gender-based variations in clinical course, Endoscopic and histological findings of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome - Multicenter study from Pakistan.

Nazish Butt, Ghulam Mohiuddin, Ali Akbar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nazish ButtNazish Butt Department of Gastroenterology, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi, Pakistan.
Ghulam MohiuddinGhulam Mohiuddin Department of Gastroenterology, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi, Pakistan.
Ali AkbarAli Akbar Department of Gastroenterology, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objective: Solitary Rectal Ulcer Syndrome (SRUS) is an uncommon, chronic disorder of the pelvic floor associated with defecatory dysfunction. This prospective observational study aimed to assess the comprehensive manifestations of SRUS with a focus on sex differences in risk factors, clinical presentation, and endoscopic and histopathological findings. Methodology: The study included 132 patients (81 females, 51 males) diagnosed with SRUS at a Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre and National Medical Centre in Pakistan between 2017 and 2024. Results: The most commonly affected age group was 21-30 years. Clinically, rectal bleeding was the predominant symptom in both genders (74.5% males, 71.6% females; p=0.715), followed by rectal pain (41.2% males, 48.1% females; p=0.433) and altered bowel habits (15.7% males, 16.0% females; p=0.956). Self-digitation was reported by 86.2% of males and 88.8% of females (p=0.654). Endoscopically, solitary rectal ulcer was observed in 60.7% of males and 60.4% of females (p=0.973), while proctitis was present in 58.8% of males and 59.2% of females (p=0.960). Histologically, crypt distortion was noted in 43.1% of males and 29.6% of females (p=0.113), fibromuscular obliteration in 56.8% of males and 45.6% of females (p=0.211), and surface ulceration in 47.0% of males and 45.6% of females (p=0.877). Although no statistically significant gender differences were identified, the study highlights the need for larger-scale investigations to explore these patterns further. Conclusion: This study shows SRUS is more common in females 81 (61%) and commonly affects those aged 21 to 30 years, 46 (34.8%) and bleeding per rectum was the most frequent presenting symptom 96 (72.7%).

Indexed as

Rectal BleedingSolitary Rectal Ulcer Syndrome (SRUS)

Identifiers

PMID41394381
PMCPMC12697036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.