Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41394368›Full record

ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences2025

Effectiveness of Electric Muscle Stimulation (EMS) and Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation (TENS) in patients with overactive bladder: A randomized controlled trial.

Sajid Rashid, Omama Sajid

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sajid RashidSajid Rashid, Multan Medical & Dental College, Multan, Pakistan.
Omama SajidOmama Sajid, Multan Medical & Dental College, Multan, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To compare the outcome of the patients of Overactive Bladder with traditional treatment alone and with EMS and TENS in study groups. Methodology: A randomized controlled trial was conducted at Ibn e Siena Hospital, Multan, spanned from October, 2019 to March, 2021 with IRB approval (Letter No. C-32-120, dated January 31, 2020). A total of 315 patients aged 35-60 years with overactive bladder symptoms were stratified into three groups i.e., Control, EMS and TENS (n=105 each). The control group received anticholinergic drugs and pelvic floor exercises, while the TENS and EMS groups received respective modalities along with conventional treatment for the duration of 12 weeks. Symptom severity was assessed using the Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS). One-way ANOVA and post hoc analysis were used for statistical comparison. Results: All three treatments reduced symptom severity however EMS showed the highest improvement (20%), followed by TENS (9.5%) and then Control (7.6%). EMS and TENS groups showed statistically significant improvements compared to the control. Conclusion: Neuromodulation offers a promising, noninvasive approach for managing overactive bladder (OAB). This study demonstrated that both EMS and TENS significantly reduced OAB symptoms, with EMS showing superior efficacy across all parameters. These findings support EMS as a safe and effective treatment option, particularly for patients seeking alternatives to pharmacologic or surgical interventions.

Indexed as

Nerve stimulationOveractive bladderTranscutaneous electric nerve stimulationUrinary Incontinence

Identifiers

PMID41394368
PMCPMC12697027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.