ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences2025
Perceptions and Feedback of Medical Students regarding Simulation Based Learning at Dow Medical College Karachi.
Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To determine the medical students' perception and feedback of Simulation Based Teaching at Dow Medical College, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi. Methodology: This cross-sectional study was conducted in Dow Medical College, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan during the period December 2024 to January 2025. All final year students of DMC were given a chance to participate in this study. Online Google Form was created, and no personal data was collected. The questionnaire measured three domains of student's perception to teaching at simulation lab. Results: A total of 112 students participated in the study. Satisfaction was defined if the mean score of a factor was ≥ 3.0. The mean satisfaction score with respect to the first domain which is related to SBL, simulation laboratory and instructors was 4.3 ±0.80. The mean score related to the second domain related to positive aspects of SBL was 4.29 ±0.70. Reverse coding was done for three questions in the third domain namely the negative aspects of SBL. The mean score of the third domain was found to be 2.61 ±1.01. Conclusion: Study reveal a favourable perception of medical students to SBL with regards to the teachers, the realism of the scenarios and the beneficial effects of SBL concerning its helpfulness in retaining medical knowledge, improving communication skills and confidence in dealing with future emergency situations. Our results also reveal a significant need in increasing the number of manikins' and teachers/instructors at the simulation laboratory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.