ArticleFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2025
Characterizing adult rehabilitation programs for solid organ transplant candidates and recipients across Canada.
Article in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Rehabilitation is integral for solid organ transplant (SOT) candidates and recipients, and aims to build physical capacity for surgery, facilitate post-operative recovery, and mitigate long-term complications. Prior to the COVID-19 era, in-person programs were the primary delivery model in Canadian SOT rehabilitation programs, but there are several knowledge gaps with the current delivery models. The aims of this study were to: 1) assess the characteristics and current practices of SOT rehabilitation programs in Canada, and 2) identify key facilitators and barriers to providing rehabilitation for the SOT population. Methods: An electronic survey was administered to 17 adult Canadian SOT rehabilitation programs utilizing REDCap in April 2024. The survey examined types of exercise training and supervision practices, clinical outcome measures, delivery models, safety considerations, facilitators, and barriers. Survey measures were summarized using descriptive statistics. Results: The response rate was 59% (10/17). Post COVID-19, there has been a shift in program delivery, with majority (60%) of SOT rehabilitation programs now using a hybrid approach comprised of both in-person and virtual components. There is heterogeneity among programs with respect to clinical assessments, safety measures, and virtual rehabilitation platforms. The most common barriers were limitations in funding and healthcare personnel. Conclusion: This study provides a better understanding of the current landscape and variability of SOT rehabilitation programs. Most programs have transitioned to hybrid models post-COVID-19, which may facilitate greater access. Future research can leverage findings from this survey to optimize SOT rehabilitation programs and improve clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.