Trial reportBioMed research international2025
Healing Oral Mucositis With
Trial report in BioMed research international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Healing Oral Mucositis WithBioMed research international · 2025Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Oral mucositis affects up to 80% of patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation, causing painful ulcers, increased infection risk, and impaired quality of life. Current treatments are mainly palliative, highlighting the need for new therapeutic options. Objective: The objective of the study is to evaluate the wound healing potential of a mucoadhesive gel containing 2.5% Methods: This was a randomized, controlled, open-label, parallel-group clinical trial conducted at HC/UNICAMP from October 2022 to November 2024. Forty-four patients were randomized to the intervention group (mucoadhesive Results: Twenty participants in the intervention group and 18 in the control group completed the study. Mean healing time was 5.2 ± 1.5 days for the intervention group and 11.2 ± 6.5 days for the control group, representing a 2.2-fold faster healing with Conclusion: The mucoadhesive gel containing Trial Registration: ReBEC number: RBR-5×4397.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.