ReviewTherapeutic advances in neurological disorders2025
CAR T-cell therapy for neurological disorders: scientific rationale and mechanistic insights.
Review in Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The neuroimmune network in Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases: from mechanistic insights to biomarker-guided immunotherapies and clinical translation.Inflammopharmacology · 2026Review
- The prospects of CAR T-cell therapies in changing the therapeutic algorithm of neurologic autoimmunities.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2026Review
- Progress of biological agents and CAR cell therapy in the treatment of common autoimmune diseases in children.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The development and successful clinical application of engineered T cells expressing synthetic chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) represents a milestone in cancer therapy. This approach optimizes physiological in vivo T-cell activation against specific target antigens expressed on defined cell subsets with the goal of their deep and sustained depletion. Significant progress has been made in redesigning CAR T-cell constructs to improve patient safety, therapeutic efficacy, and accessibility. Efforts have also focused on streamlining manufacturing to improve availability and reduce costs, two critical challenges to widespread adoption. Beyond hematologic malignancies, CAR T-cell therapies are now increasingly being repurposed to tackle B-cell-mediated autoimmune diseases (AIDs). This is primarily achieved through broad B-cell depletion, but more targeted approaches-such as the selective elimination of autoantibody-producing B-cell subpopulations-are also being explored. Important considerations in their implementation are identifying the most pertinent patient groups, tailoring their treatment up to the point of CAR-infusion, and following up on their unique toxicity-profile. In the context of neurological AIDs-including refractory myasthenia gravis, Lambert-Eaton syndrome, multiple sclerosis, and stiff-person syndrome-early clinical experience suggests promising efficacy and tolerability, leading to a growing number of registered clinical trials. In this review, we provide an overview of the mechanism and evolution of CAR T-cell therapy, highlighting why its application in AIDs, particularly in neurology, represents a highly promising therapeutic strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.