ArticleJugan geon-gang gwa jilbyeong2025
Current Status and Directions for Improvement of the National Health Information Portal.
Article in Jugan geon-gang gwa jilbyeong, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study analyzed the current operation of the National Health Information Portal, which provides trustworthy evidence-based health information to the public, to propose directions for improvement in response to the evolving artificial intelligence (AI)-based search environment and increasing demand for personalized health information. Methods: To examine Portal operation, we reviewed project reports, internal planning documents, content management system data, Google Analytics 4 statistics, and triennial quality assessment results produced by the Seoul National University R&DB Foundation, which has managed the project since 2018. Relevant policy documents and domestic and international best practices were also analyzed to identify directions for improvement. Results: The Portal operates to achieve its core values of "verified, easy-to-understand, and integrated information" through a standardized authoring and review system. It enhances reliability and accessibility by developing life cycle-based customized content, providing plain language explanations and summaries, and establishing an ontology- and metadata-based management framework. User engagement has been strengthened by improvements in user interfaces, newsletters, and interactive events. Conclusions: In response to expanding AI-based search availability, the Portal has implemented a Generative Engine Optimization strategy and is exploring strategies to more effectively provide personalized health information in the future, including connectivity with national personal health record systems. The Portal will continue to strengthen its role as a leading public platform that improves health literacy and promotes healthy lifestyle practices in the population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.