ReviewBiomaterials research2025
Biomedical Aerogels in Wound Healing: Therapeutic Strategies and Translational Insights.
Review in Biomaterials research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cellulose and Its Derivatives-Based Skin Dressings: Design, Smart Advances and Applications.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Polysaccharide-Based Biomaterials: Chemical Design and Advanced Dressings for Diabetic Chronic Wound Repair.International journal of general medicine · 2026Review
- Multifunctional pH-responsive HA-c-FZ1 hydrogel presents a promising therapeutic strategy for diabetic skin wounds.Burns & trauma · 2026Article
- Zinc ion-releasing immunomodulatory hydrogels for enhanced wound healing.Regenerative biomaterials · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wound healing is a complex, highly orchestrated process involving hemostasis, inflammation, proliferation, and remodeling. While acute wounds typically progress through these phases efficiently, chronic wounds-such as diabetic foot ulcers, pressure ulcers, and venous leg ulcers-often stagnate due to persistent bacterial colonization, excessive inflammation, impaired angiogenesis, and reduced extracellular matrix deposition. These pathological features lead to prolonged healing, high recurrence rates, and substantial socioeconomic burdens, which are further exacerbated by global aging, rising diabetes prevalence, and lifestyle-related comorbidities. Conventional wound dressings, including gauze, films, hydrocolloids, and hydrogels, exhibit limitations in infection control, sustained moisture balance, controlled therapeutic release, and adaptability to irregular wound surfaces. Aerogels, a class of ultralightweight, highly porous materials with porosity exceeding 90% and an exceptional surface area, have emerged as promising candidates for advanced wound care. Their unique structure enables superior exudate management, tunable mechanical compliance, and efficient loading of bioactive agents. Composed of inorganic, biopolymeric, or composite matrices, aerogels can be functionalized with antimicrobial nanoparticles, growth factors, or photothermal agents to integrate rapid hemostasis, infection control, immune modulation, and regenerative stimulation within a single platform. However, translational challenges remain, including variability in biodegradation, long-term biocompatibility concerns for certain inorganic systems, high production costs, and scale-up difficulties. This review summarizes recent advances in aerogel-based wound dressings, functionalization strategies, and preclinical evidence while critically analyzing barriers to clinical translation. By bridging multidisciplinary insights, we aim to guide the development of multifunctional aerogel dressings toward precision, intelligent wound care solutions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.