ArticleEcology and evolution2025
Zooming In: Assessing the Transferability of SDMs From Large to Small Spatial Extents.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Zooming In: Assessing the Transferability of SDMs From Large to Small Spatial Extents.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Species Distribution Models (SDMs) represent a common method for predicting biodiversity responses to environmental changes. SDMs are typically established for and applied to large areas, while little is known about the transferability of large-scale SDMs to smaller spatial extents. This study aims to fill this gap by fitting country-level ensemble SDMs for the seven native reptile species occurring in the Netherlands, and testing their predictive ability against independent occurrence data in 10 municipalities. For each of the species, we trained an ensemble SDM using bioclimatic variables, land cover fractions and soil type as predictors. We then evaluated model performance in 10 municipalities that were not included in model training. Despite performing well at national extent, with a mean cross-validated True Skill Statistic (TSS) value of 0.85 (range of 0.76-0.94) across the species, the ensemble SDMs generally yielded poor to moderate performance scores for the municipalities. Averaged per species, TSS values ranged from 0.05 to 0.57, while mean TSS values per municipality ranged from -0.07 to 0.61. The general decrease in model performance from national to local extent was mainly due to a decline in model specificity (i.e., the ability to predict absence). A two-way ANOVA showed model performance varied significantly among both municipalities and species (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.