ReviewEcology and evolution2025
Progress and Prospects of Research on Microhabitat Scale Characterization and Utilization in Chinese Karst Area.
Review in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Progress and Prospects of Research on Microhabitat Scale Characterization and Utilization in Chinese Karst Area.Ecology and evolution · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Karst microhabitats, characterized by their complex structures and unique functions, serve as critical habitats and resource reservoirs for biodiversity. However, systematic research in this area remains limited. This study conducts a systematic literature review based on publications from the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Web of Science (WOS) databases, with a focus on karst microhabitats in China. The objectives are to synthesize domestic research progress and compare it with international studies to enhance the understanding of microhabitats. The findings reveal that: (i) the number of publications on this topic has generally increased, with CNKI literature predominantly centered on karst and microhabitat entities (47% of the total), whereas WOS publications place greater emphasis on biodiversity within microhabitats (24%); (ii) key advances and landmark findings from studies conducted at different scales in Chinese karst regions are highlighted, along with a summary of critical scientific issues; and (iii) representative techniques applicable to karst microhabitats in China are evaluated, drawing on international research experience and their adaptive outcomes. Moving forward, research on karst microhabitats in China should prioritize quantitative analysis of subsurface spatial characteristics and integrate interdisciplinary approaches to elucidate resource allocation mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.