Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41394177›Full record

ArticleThe annals of applied statistics2024

PROBABILISTIC CONTRASTIVE DIMENSION REDUCTION FOR CASE-CONTROL STUDY DATA.

Didong Li, Andrew Jones, Barbara Engelhardt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The annals of applied statistics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Contrastive independent component analysis for salient patterns and dimensionality reduction.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. The Rayleigh Quotient and Contrastive Principal Component Analysis I.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. CONTRASTIVE LINEAR REGRESSION.The annals of applied statistics · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Didong LiDepartment of Biostatistics, University or North Carolina at Chapel Hill.ORCID 0000-0001-9146-705X
Andrew JonesDepartment of Computer Science, Princeton University.ORCID 0000-0001-5701-6570
Barbara EngelhardtGladstone Institutes.ORCID 0000-0002-6139-7334

Funding

Re-Entry Supplement: Investigation of Oral Microbial Enzymes for the Detection and Treatment of Periodontal DiseaseUL1TR002489 · NCATS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BUSE, JOHN BERNARD, SHAHEEN, NICHOLAS J · 2018 to 2022
$48.6M
UNC-CH CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH &SUSCEPTIBILITYP30ES010126 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Stephanie Engel · 2001 to 2026
$36.3M
The Cellular Geography of Therapeutic Resistance in CancerU2CCA233195 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI JOHNSON, BRUCE E. · 2018 to 2023
$13.7M
A kinetic framework to map the genetic determinants of alternative RNA isoform expressionR01HG012967 · NHGRI · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI Barbara Engelhardt, Athma A Pai · 2023 to 2026
$3.0M
Semiparametric Analysis of Big Censored DataR01HL149683 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI LIN, DANYU · 2020 to 2023
$1.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002489NCI NIH HHS U2C CA233195NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG012967NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL149683NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES010126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Case-control experiments are essential to the scientific method, as they allow researchers to test biological hypotheses by looking for differences in outcome between cases and controls. It is then of interest to characterize variation that is enriched in a "foreground" (case) dataset relative to a "background" (control) dataset. For example, in a genomics context, the goal is to identify low-dimensional transcriptional structure unique to patients with certain disease (cases) vs. those without that disease (controls). In this work we propose probabilistic contrastive principal component analysis (PCPCA), a probabilistic dimension reduction method designed for case-control data. We describe inference in PCPCA through a contrastive likelihood and show that our model generalizes PCA, probabilistic PCA, and contrastive PCA. We discuss how to set the tuning parameter in theory and in practice, and we show several of PCPCA's advantages in the analysis of case-control data over related methods, including greater interpretability, uncertainty quantification and principled inference, robustness to noise and missing data, and the ability to generate "foreground-enriched" data from the model. We demonstrate PCPCA's performance on case-control data through a series of simulations, and we successfully identify variation specific to case data in genomic case-control experiments with data modalities, including gene expression, protein expression, and images.

Indexed as

contrastive modelHigh-dimensional dataprobabilistic principal components analysis

Identifiers

PMID41394177
PMCPMC12700624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.