ArticleThe annals of applied statistics2024
PROBABILISTIC CONTRASTIVE DIMENSION REDUCTION FOR CASE-CONTROL STUDY DATA.
Article in The annals of applied statistics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interpretation, extrapolation and perturbation of single cells.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- Joint modeling of cellular heterogeneity and condition effects with scPCA in single-cell RNA-seq.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Contrastive independent component analysis for salient patterns and dimensionality reduction.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- The Rayleigh Quotient and Contrastive Principal Component Analysis I.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- CONTRASTIVE LINEAR REGRESSION.The annals of applied statistics · 2025Article
- PROBABILISTIC CONTRASTIVE DIMENSION REDUCTION FOR CASE-CONTROL STUDY DATA.The annals of applied statistics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Case-control experiments are essential to the scientific method, as they allow researchers to test biological hypotheses by looking for differences in outcome between cases and controls. It is then of interest to characterize variation that is enriched in a "foreground" (case) dataset relative to a "background" (control) dataset. For example, in a genomics context, the goal is to identify low-dimensional transcriptional structure unique to patients with certain disease (cases) vs. those without that disease (controls). In this work we propose probabilistic contrastive principal component analysis (PCPCA), a probabilistic dimension reduction method designed for case-control data. We describe inference in PCPCA through a contrastive likelihood and show that our model generalizes PCA, probabilistic PCA, and contrastive PCA. We discuss how to set the tuning parameter in theory and in practice, and we show several of PCPCA's advantages in the analysis of case-control data over related methods, including greater interpretability, uncertainty quantification and principled inference, robustness to noise and missing data, and the ability to generate "foreground-enriched" data from the model. We demonstrate PCPCA's performance on case-control data through a series of simulations, and we successfully identify variation specific to case data in genomic case-control experiments with data modalities, including gene expression, protein expression, and images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.