Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41394156›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in pharmacology2025

The efficacy and safety of combining different Chinese patent medicines with conventional Western drugs in the treatment of pediatric allergic rhinitis: network meta-analysis.

Yue Ma, Wenrui Huang, Hang Wu, Chunbo Zhang, Zhiyue Xiao, Yuying Gao, Junying Xie, Jingyao Xu

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yue MaChangchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun, Jilin, China.
Wenrui HuangGuangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Hang WuThe Third Affiliated Hospital of Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun, Jilin, China.
Chunbo ZhangJilin Central Hospital, Jilin, Jilin, China.
Zhiyue XiaoChangchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun, Jilin, China.
Yuying GaoChangchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun, Jilin, China.
Junying XieChangchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun, Jilin, China.
Jingyao XuChangchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun, Jilin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ethnopharmacological Significance: Pediatric allergic rhinitis (AR) is often treated with conventional Western medical therapy (CWMT), but such regimens can cause adverse effects. Evidence suggests that Chinese patent medicines (CPMs) combined with CWMT may improve symptom control and immunological markers, yet no PRISMA-compliant network meta-analysis (NMA) has systematically compared available CPMs. Objective: This study aims to conduct an NMA of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy and safety of CPMs plus CWMT in pediatric AR. Methods: We conducted a PRISMA-guided NMA of randomized controlled trials evaluating CPMs plus CWMT versus CWMT alone for pediatric allergic rhinitis. Eight databases were searched through May 2025. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool, and evidence certainty was graded using the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA) framework. Continuous outcomes were expressed as standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), while binary outcomes were summarized as odds ratios (ORs) or risk ratios (RRs) with corresponding 95% CIs. Analyses were performed in StataMP 18, and treatment hierarchies were ranked using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) method. Results: A total of 49 RCTs involving 5,062 participants and 13 CPMs were included. Compared with CWMT alone, the combination of CPMs and CWMT significantly improved the Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS). Tongqiao Biyan Granules (TBG) achieved the greatest improvements across nasal obstruction (SMD = -1.79, 95% CI: -2.84 to -0.74; SUCRA 72.3%), sneezing (SMD = -2.09, 95% CI: -3.27 to -0.91; SUCRA 78.8%), and rhinorrhea (SMD = -1.88, 95% CI: -3.20 to -0.56; SUCRA 78.2%), indicating consistent superiority over other regimens, and Sanfeng Tongqiao Dropping Pills (STDP) being most effective for nasal pruritus (SMD = -1.57; SUCRA 81.9%). For overall efficacy, all CPM combinations outperformed CWMT, with Cang'er Zibi Yan Pills (CBP) achieving the highest improvement (RR = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.06-1.49; SUCRA 77.2%). Although seven CPMs showed a trend toward reduced serum IgE, none reached statistical significance; Xinqin Granules (XG) ranked highest (SUCRA 76.9%). Adverse events were generally mild and less frequent with combination therapy, with Yuping Feng Granules (YG) showing the lowest risk (OR = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.19-0.55 SUCRA 79.5%). Recurrence analysis (18 trials, 1,511 participants) indicated that most CPM combinations lowered relapse risk, with Huaiqi Huang Granules (HG) performing best (OR = 0.24, 95% CI: 0.06-0.92; SUCRA 84.8%). Sensitivity and meta-regression analyses confirmed the robustness of these findings, and all significant TNSS improvements exceeded the minimal clinically important difference (MCID = 0.55), indicating clinically meaningful symptom relief. Conclusion: Combining CPMs with CWMT may offer superior efficacy and safety for pediatric AR. These findings support CPMs as an adjunct to standard therapy, though large, high-quality RCTs are warranted for confirmation. Systematic Review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251080593.

Indexed as

allergic rhinitisChinese patent medicinesconventional Western medical therapynetwork meta-analysisrandomized controlled trials

Identifiers

PMID41394156
PMCPMC12695863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.