Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41394094›Full record

ReviewJournal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS2025

A Narrative Review of Mesh Suture in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction: Biomechanics, Early Outcomes, and Proposed Clinical Algorithm.

Megan M Perez, Gregory A Dumanian, Paige N Hackenberger, David Ross, Jonah Stulberg, Michael Shapiro

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Megan M PerezDivision of Plastic Surgery, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.
Gregory A DumanianDivision of Plastic Surgery, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.
Paige N HackenbergerDivision of Plastic Surgery, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.
David RossEmeritus Plastic Surgeon, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Jonah StulbergUniversity of Texas, Houston, TX, United States.
Michael ShapiroDepartment of Surgery, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Suture repair of abdominal wall defects is prone to failure due to suture pull-through. In contrast, planar mesh reinforcement improves durability but is limited by increased foreign body burden, need for additional tissue dissection, and challenges in contaminated fields. Mesh suture offers a potential alternative combining both the ease of suture repair with improved load distribution and early tissue integration, characteristics of planar mesh repairs. This review summarizes the biomechanical rationale, histologic characteristics, and early clinical experiences with mesh suture to date. Methods: A narrative review of preclinical and clinical literature regarding mesh suture was performed using a targeted search of PubMed and Google Scholar with key terms ("mesh suture" or "Duramesh"). Studies were included if they evaluated mesh suture in biomechanical, preclinical or clinical contexts. A proposed clinical algorithm based on institutional experiences is presented to illustrate patient selection and technique. Results: Preclinical studies demonstrate favorable mechanical performance and early fibrovascular incorporation. Early clinical data from registries and institutional cohorts suggests mesh suture is feasible even in contaminated settings with outcomes that compare to both standard suture and planar mesh repairs. Conclusion: Mesh suture may offer a reinforcement strategy that balances mechanical support with tissue preservation in abdominal wall reconstruction. Current clinical evidence remains preliminary, and additional prospective, randomized studies are needed to more definitely evaluate its clinical performance over time.

Indexed as

abdominal wall closurecontaminated woundsherniameshmesh complications

Identifiers

PMID41394094
PMCPMC12695721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.