Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41394069›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Pathway insights: exploring profiles and processes of drop-in students in relation to completion rates in second chance education.

Lana Van Den Berghe, Sarah S W De Pauw, Stijn Vandevelde

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lana Van Den BergheDepartment of Special Needs Education, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Sarah S W De PauwDepartment of Special Needs Education, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Stijn VandeveldeDepartment of Special Needs Education, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Obtaining an upper secondary degree is highly esteemed for its economic and societal value. For students dropping out of school who return to education to earning an upper secondary degree (cf. high school-ISCED level 3)-termed "drop-in students" in this study-alternative pathways like "Second Chance Education" (SCE) have emerged. Empirical studies on these programs are limited, hindering theoretical progress and the understanding of drop-in students' psychological and educational processes. To address this, the study aims to examine the profiles of drop-in students and the processes that may influence course completion rates in SCE. In doing so, it contributes to the growing body of research on SCE by investigating (1) student profiles and (2) the processes potentially affecting completion rates within a large sample of drop-in students. Methods: On this basis, a novel model was developed, including background variables (demographic, educational, and employment information), individual processes (educational motivation, aspirations, psychological needs, and wellbeing), and environmental processes (supportive relationships and contextual barriers). Conducted in Belgium, this quantitative study surveyed 528 drop-in students (M Results: The results advance theoretical understanding and offer insights into the profiles of drop-in students and the processes influencing completion rates (i.e., lower completion rates for those students who speak a different home language, experienced grade retention, have lower motivational quality, higher relatedness and competence frustration, and fewer supportive relationships). Discussion: This study points to implications of reimagining support for students in education, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive approach to address various aspects simultaneously.

Indexed as

basic psychological needseducational motivationschool dropoutSecond Chance Educationself-determination theory

Identifiers

PMID41394069
PMCPMC12698612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.