ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
The impact of nurse-led, AI-assisted perioperative health education on psychological status and quality of life in patients undergoing lung cancer surgery.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the clinical value of integrating artificial intelligence (AI) into perioperative health education for patients undergoing surgery for lung cancer. Methods: This retrospective study included patients who underwent radical resection for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the Department of Thoracic Surgery at the First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University between January and December 2024. According to the perioperative education method, patients who met the inclusion criteria from January to May 2024 were included in the conventional group, whereas those from June to December 2024 were included in the AI-assisted group. All patients received standardized rehabilitation education based on a unified handbook. On this basis, the AI-assisted group additionally received individualized health education and psychological counseling generated by AI, which was verified and supplemented by nurses. Clinical data and validated questionnaire scores were collected and analyzed. Results: A total of 135 patients were included, with 70 in the conventional group and 65 in the AI-assisted group. There were no significant differences in demographic and clinical characteristics between the groups. Compared with the conventional group, patients in the AI-assisted group scored significantly higher on the "confrontation" dimension of the Medical Coping Modes Questionnaire (MCMQ), indicating a stronger tendency toward active coping, whereas no significant differences were observed in the "avoidance" and "acceptance-resignation" dimensions. Regarding psychological status, the AI-assisted group had significantly lower depression and anxiety scores postoperatively, while stress scores showed no significant difference. Quality of life, assessed by the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF), revealed that the AI-assisted group had significantly higher scores in the psychological and social domains as well as the overall score, with no significant differences in the physical or environmental domains. Conclusion: Nurse-led perioperative health education supported by AI tools can help optimize patients' coping strategies, reduce negative psychological states, and improve quality of life after lung cancer surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.