ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
The impact of digital health literacy on marriage-and-childbearing anxiety among Chinese youth of reproductive age.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Perceived parental encouragement on self-efficacy and resilience of Chinese college students.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In the digital era, information on marriage and childbearing is predominantly accessed online, yet the coexistence of information overload and misinformation may amplify anxiety among reproductive-aged young adults. This study investigates the impact and underlying mechanisms of digital health literacy (DHL) on marriage-and-childbearing anxiety (MCA), aiming to provide empirical evidence for alleviating this growing concern. Methods: An empirical analysis was conducted using survey data from 748 reproductive-aged young adults. Multiple econometric methods were employed to ensure robustness: ordinary least squares (OLS) regression and ordered Probit models for baseline estimates, instrumental variable two-stage least squares (2SLS) to address endogeneity, and formal mediation tests to examine indirect effects. Results: First, DHL exhibits a significant negative effect on MCA, which remains stable after robustness checks and endogeneity correction. Second, information cognition, risk perception, and social support serve as three key mediating pathways linking DHL to MCA, with risk perception playing the most prominent role. Third, the protective effect of DHL against MCA shows significant heterogeneity across gender, household registration type, income level, urban classification tiers, and different dimensions of DHL. Discussion: These findings elucidate the mechanisms through which DHL influences MCA and provide targeted theoretical and empirical support for developing evidence-based interventions to reduce marriage-and-childbearing anxiety among young adults in the digital era.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.