ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
FastACI: a toolbox for investigating auditory perception using reverse correlation.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- FastACI: a toolbox for investigating auditory perception using reverse correlation.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Mapping the spectrotemporal regions influencing perception of French stop consonants in noise.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The fastACI toolbox provides a compilation of tools for collecting and analyzing data from auditory reverse-correlation experiments. These experiments involve behavioral listening tasks including one or more target sounds presented with some random fluctuation, typically in the form of additive background noise. In turn, the paired stimulus-response data from each trial can be used to assess the relevant acoustic features that were effectively used by the listener while performing the task. The results are summarized as a matrix of perceptual weights termed auditory classification image. The framework provided by the toolbox is flexible and it has been so far used to probe different auditory mechanisms such as tone-in-noise detection, amplitude modulation detection, phoneme-in-noise categorization, and word segmentation. In this article, we present the structure of the toolbox, how it can be used to run existing experiments or design new ones, as well as the main options for analyzing the collected data. We then illustrate the capabilities of the toolbox through five case studies: a replication of a pioneering reverse correlation study from 1975, an example of reproduction of the analyses of one of our previous studies, a comparison of the results of three phoneme-categorization experiments, and a quantification of how noise type and estimation method affect the quality of the resulting auditory classification image.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.