Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41394055›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

FastACI: a toolbox for investigating auditory perception using reverse correlation.

Alejandro Osses, Azal Le Bagousse, Léo Varnet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alejandro OssesLaboratoire des systémes perceptifs, Departement d'études cognitives, École normale supérieure, PSL University, Centre national de la recherche scientifique, Paris, France.
Azal Le BagousseLaboratoire des systémes perceptifs, Departement d'études cognitives, École normale supérieure, PSL University, Centre national de la recherche scientifique, Paris, France.
Léo VarnetLaboratoire des systémes perceptifs, Departement d'études cognitives, École normale supérieure, PSL University, Centre national de la recherche scientifique, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fastACI toolbox provides a compilation of tools for collecting and analyzing data from auditory reverse-correlation experiments. These experiments involve behavioral listening tasks including one or more target sounds presented with some random fluctuation, typically in the form of additive background noise. In turn, the paired stimulus-response data from each trial can be used to assess the relevant acoustic features that were effectively used by the listener while performing the task. The results are summarized as a matrix of perceptual weights termed auditory classification image. The framework provided by the toolbox is flexible and it has been so far used to probe different auditory mechanisms such as tone-in-noise detection, amplitude modulation detection, phoneme-in-noise categorization, and word segmentation. In this article, we present the structure of the toolbox, how it can be used to run existing experiments or design new ones, as well as the main options for analyzing the collected data. We then illustrate the capabilities of the toolbox through five case studies: a replication of a pioneering reverse correlation study from 1975, an example of reproduction of the analyses of one of our previous studies, a comparison of the results of three phoneme-categorization experiments, and a quantification of how noise type and estimation method affect the quality of the resulting auditory classification image.

Indexed as

auditory classification imageopen sciencepsychoacousticsreverse correlationtoolbox

Identifiers

PMID41394055
PMCPMC12699384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.