Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41394054›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Reconceptualizing English language learning resilience from positive psychology: scale development and psychometric validation.

Ting Yin, Jiexin Chen, Zhiqing Lin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ting YinSchool of Foreign Languages, Guangdong Polytechnic Normal University, Guangzhou, China.
Jiexin ChenSchool of Foreign Languages, Neusoft Institute Guangdong, Foshan, China.
Zhiqing LinSchool of Foreign Languages, Guangdong Polytechnic Normal University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Resilience, a central construct in positive psychology, plays a crucial role in helping language learners cope with and grow from the challenges inherent in English language learning. However, few systematically validated instruments are available to assess resilience within this specific context. To address this gap, the present study developed and validated the English Language Learning Resilience Scale. Methods: Data were collected from 617 Chinese university students. The internal structure of the scale was examined through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, followed by measurement invariance testing. Additionally, the graded response model was applied to evaluate the psychometric properties of individual items. Results: Results of factor analysis identified five protective factors-value, perseverance, emotion regulation, social support, and self-efficacy-demonstrating satisfactory convergent and discriminant validity. Furthermore, the scale showed scalar measurement invariance across gender, age, and academic discipline, indicating its structural stability across diverse subgroups. Complementing these findings, item response theory analyses provided additional evidence of strong item discrimination, appropriate difficulty parameters, and high measurement precision. Conclusion: Theoretically, the study reconceptualizes resilience in language learning through the lens of positive psychology, offering a more nuanced understanding of its dimensions and functions. Practically, the scale offers educators a diagnostic tool for identifying learners with lower resilience and implementing targeted interventions to strengthen their capacity to adapt, persist, and thrive in the face of linguistic challenges, thereby promoting both their language learning success and overall psychological well-being.

Indexed as

language learningmeasurement invariancepositive psychologypsychometric validationresilience scale

Identifiers

PMID41394054
PMCPMC12698394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.