ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
An examination of the cognitive and affective processes in errorless motor learning: study protocol.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acquiring movement skills is crucial across the lifespan, supporting an individual's participation in sports and physical activities. Errorless motor learning, which promotes success during practice, has been shown to be effective for acquiring or reacquiring (e.g., following injury/disease) movement skills. This research explores the underlying processes of errorless motor learning in children and older adults. We will investigate two distinct processes associated with motor learning: (i) cognitive processing measured by movement variability and prefrontal cortex (PFC) activity and (ii) affective processing measured by perceived competence. We will recruit two participant groups-children, and older adults-who will practice a novel throwing task in either a condition where errors are minimized or a condition where errors freely occur. We will measure task performance, movement variability, perceived competence, and PFC activity before, during, and after practice. We will control for individual cognitive abilities (processing speed and executive function) and use hierarchical linear mixed models to compare the variables between the practice conditions and to verify whether the cognitive and affective processes influence outcomes following practice. The findings are expected to contribute to our understanding of skills acquisition across the lifespan and help facilitate the (re)acquisition of motor skills by children and older adults through programs provided by physiotherapists, coaches, teachers, and health professionals. This study has been registered in the Open Science Framework Registries (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/YTERV).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.