ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Restorative benefits of multisensory experiences in a classical Chinese garden compared to visual experiences only.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Examining the Effects of Viewing Nature and Animal Smartphone Wallpapers on Affect, Behaviour, and Cognition: A Randomised Cross-Over Trial.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Classical Chinese gardens are renowned for their multisensory designs and are widely recognized for their potential to promote emotional well-being. The Humble Administrator's Garden was utilized in this study to assess how the multisensory integration embedded in its design influences psychological and physiological restoration. Methods: As a pilot study, a multi-modal quantitative approach compared participants' responses to the garden under two conditions: a real-world multisensory environment (Condition A) and a visual VR experience using a static 360° image (Condition B). The same group of 28 participants took part in five-minute sessions for each condition. Data included the Profile of Mood States (POMS), heart rate, eye tracking, and a questionnaire. In Condition A, sessions before 8:00 a.m. with few visitors were classified as the "Uncrowded group," while those after 8:00 a.m., when tour groups arrived, were classified as the "Crowded group," to assess visitor-related ambient effects on restoration. Results: Participants in the real-world condition exhibited significantly greater mood modulation, increased attentional engagement, and a reduction in heart rate, particularly in uncrowded settings. In contrast, the VR condition yielded comparatively weaker restorative outcomes, suggesting that both the absence of non-visual inputs and the lack of visual movement limited the replication of the multisensory restorative experience. Discussion: This pilot study suggests that the restorative effects of classical Chinese gardens derive from the coherence of multisensory inputs, more fully experienced in real settings through visual and non-visual interactions. While multisensory coherence supports psychological benefits, disturbances such as noise and crowding can disrupt this harmony, weakening restorative outcomes. These exploratory findings offer initial guidance for the development of restorative virtual environments and the management of heritage sites, while underscoring the need for larger-scale and more immersive studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.