ArticleBMJ public health2025
Occupational physical activity and risk of all-cause, cardiovascular disease and cancer mortality among adults in the USA: a national cohort study.
Article in BMJ public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Evidence on the health effects of occupational physical activity (OPA) remains inconsistent, and potential sex-based differences in physical activity outcomes are understudied. Our goal was to investigate the relationships between OPA and leisure time physical activity (LTPA), both separately and in combination, and the risk of cancer, cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality by sex. Methods: Using data from the NHANES 2007-2018 database, the study involved 29 404 adults aged 20 years and older with OPA. Physical activity was assessed through the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire, subjects were classified as inactive, insufficiently active, sufficiently active or highly active OPA. Mortality outcomes were determined by linking to the National Death Index records. Cox/Fine-Gray regressions were employed to investigate sex-specific multivariable-adjusted associations. Covariates including age, race, body mass index, smoking status, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, alcohol consumption, education, income to poverty ratio, marriage status, access to medical care, self-rated health, LTPA and history of diseases were adjusted in the multivariable models. Results: Over a median follow-up of 6.7 (3.7, 9.8) years for men and 6.8 (3.8,9.8) years for women, 1560 deaths in men and 1150 deaths in women occurred. For men, highly active OPA compared with inactivity was associated with 23% lower risk of all-cause mortality. For women, sufficiently active OPA compared with inactivity was associated with 36% lower risk of all-cause mortality. According to joint analyses that used inactive LTPA and inactive OPA as reference, ≥150 min LTPA was linked to the lowest risk of all-cause mortality (HR: 0.25; 95% CI 0.12 to 0.54) and cardiovascular mortality (HR 0.27, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.64) in women when combined with ≥150 min OPA. Conclusion: OPA had a beneficial association with cancer mortality in women and risk of all-cause mortality in both sexes. OPA and LTPA were jointly linked to a further decreased risk of death from all causes and cardiovascular disease in women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.