ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Development of a multimodal model combining radiomics and deep learning to predict malignant cerebral edema after endovascular thrombectomy.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Risk factors and development of a prediction model for hematoma expansion in elderly patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Article
- Malignant cerebral edema after endovascular thrombectomy: a multimodal prediction model based on post-thrombectomy cerebral hyperdensity and natural language processing.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Rapid prediction of hemorrhagic transformation after endovascular thrombectomy: a multimodal model in patients with post-thrombectomy cerebral hyperdensities.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Malignant cerebral edema (MCE) represents a severe complication after endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in treating acute ischemic stroke. This study aimed to develop and validate a multimodal predictive model integrating clinical data, radiomics features, and deep learning (DL)-derived features to improve the accuracy of MCE risk prediction following EVT. Methods: A total of 290 patients were included, comprising 189 in the training, 47 in the validation, and 54 in the internal test cohorts. A fusion model was developed by integrating clinical variables, radiomics, and DL features. Separate models based on clinical data, radiomics, and DL features were also constructed for comparison. Model training and evaluation were performed on training, validation, and test cohorts. The predictive performance of the combined model was compared with the ACORNS grading scale using an area under the curve (AUC) analysis to assess clinical effectiveness. Results: The combined model exhibited the best predictive performance. Analysis of the receiver operating characteristic curve revealed an AUC of 0.927 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.849-1.000] for predicting MCE in the validation group and an AUC of 0.924 (95% CI: 0.846-1.000) in the test group. Additionally, the fusion model consistently demonstrated higher net benefits across all threshold probabilities than the ACORNS grading scale. Conclusions: This study integrated clinical data, radiomics, and DL features to develop a multimodal predictive model with a strong discriminative ability to predict MCE after EVT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.