ArticleJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology2025
Exploring a novel voice-guided artificial intelligence platform for real-time colonoscopy documentation: a pilot study.
Article in Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advances in Artificial Intelligence for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: 2026 Update.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Accurate and consistent documentation during colonoscopy is essential for optimal patient care and therapeutic decisions. Traditional manual documentation is time-consuming and subject to variability. Artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted tools offer potential improvements by standardizing report generation in real-time. We developed a novel AI-driven, voice-guided reporting platform that uses natural language processing (NLP) and real-time image capture for endoscopy documentation. Methods: This prospective pilot study was conducted at the Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal between October 2023 and May 2024. A total of 95 patients undergoing elective endoscopy were recruited, with 57 procedures included in the final analysis. Endoscopists provided real-time verbal dictations during procedures, which the AI-assisted report generation tool transcribed and linked to captured images. The system's performance was evaluated based on documentation completeness, transcription accuracy, and user engagement. Results: The AI-assisted report generation tool successfully documented key procedural parameters when verbal annotations were provided, achieving an 87.5% detection rate for ileocecal valve identification, and 100% detection rate for procedure indication, Boston Bowel Preparation Score, withdrawal time, and polyp characterization. However, the transcription word error was 10.07%, with errors primarily in medical terminology. User engagement varied, with some procedures lacking dictated annotations. Conclusion: Our AI-assisted report generation tool demonstrates potential in standardizing colonoscopy documentation through AI-assisted, real-time NLP for generating reports. While effective, its performance depends on endoscopist engagement. Future improvements in NLP capabilities and structured reporting prompts can enhance completeness and usability, contributing to more efficient and accurate endoscopy documentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.