ArticleDigital health
Explainable AI for skin disease classification using gradient-weighted class activation mapping and transfer learning in digital health to identify contours.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Responsible artificial intelligence in medical imaging: a systematic review.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Pooled it
- Clinically Interpretable Deep Learning for Differentiating Vitiligo and Postinflammatory Hypopigmentation: Diagnostic Accuracy Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Explainable AI in Clinical Decision Support Systems: A Meta-Analysis of Methods, Applications, and Usability Challenges.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This research evaluates the feasibility of addressing computer vision problems with limited resources, particularly in the context of medical data, where patient privacy concerns restrict data availability. The study focuses on diagnosing skin diseases using five distinct transfer learning models based on convolutional neural networks. Methods: Two versions of the dataset were created, one imbalanced (4092 samples) and the other balanced (5182 samples), using simple data augmentation techniques. Preprocessing techniques were employed to enhance the quality and utility of the data, including image resizing, noise removal, and blur techniques. The performance of each model was assessed using fresh data after preprocessing. We have utilized VGG19, VGG16, GoogleNet, XceptionNet, and Inception for comparing data training performance, which indicates that our preprocessing refined the image quality and texture. Therefore, the accuracy increased after augmentation, and low output reflects that the data quality before augmentation was poor. Results: According to the research findings, the VGG-19 model achieved an accuracy of 95.00% on the imbalanced dataset. After applying augmentation on the balanced data, the best-performing model was VGG-16-Aug with an accuracy of 97.07%. These results suggest that low-resource approaches, coupled with preprocessing techniques, can effectively identify skin diseases, particularly when utilizing the VGG-16-Aug model with a balanced dataset. Conclusion: The study addresses a range of skin disorders, including acne, vitiligo, hyperpigmentation, nail psoriasis, and SJS-TEN, focusing on aspects that remain underexplored in previous research. The findings highlight the potential of simple data augmentation techniques; moreover, explainable AI: Grad-CAM interpreted the model outcome by showing image contours visually and identifying uncommon skin conditions and overcoming the data scarcity challenge. The implications of these research findings are significant for the development of machine learning-based diagnostic systems in the medical field. Further investigation is necessary to explore the generalizability of these findings to other medical datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.