ReviewDigital health
Information security and confidentiality in health chatbots: A scoping review and development of a conceptual model.
Review in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mental health chatbots and their technical features: A systematic review of reviews and a thematic analysis.Global mental health (Cambridge, England) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The present study aims to identify the key challenges related to information security and confidentiality in health chatbots, extract relevant solutions, and propose a conceptual model to ensure secure and confidential data management within such systems. Methods: To achieve the study's objectives, a scoping review was conducted. This phase focused on identifying reported challenges and proposed solutions in prior studies regarding information security and confidentiality in health chatbots. In this context, we selected English-language articles in international journals and conferences related to information security and confidentiality in health chatbots. After that, relevant international frameworks, studies, and guidelines on information security, confidentiality, and privacy were systematically reviewed and analyzed and then, a conceptual model was created which was further developed and refined through validation by a panel of experts. Results: Out of 1233 articles screened, 16 met the inclusion criteria. Recurring challenges in health chatbots, such as breaches of privacy, no transparency, incomplete consent, technical issues in data handling, lack of legal frameworks, and emerging threats, were identified in the results. The literature suggested measures like encryption, risk management, access control, standardization, and regular evaluations. Based on international frameworks, a comprehensive conceptual model with four key dimensions was developed, integrating software, hardware, and middleware layers to improve data security and confidentiality. Conclusion: These findings can benefit users, health practitioners, the regulatory authorities, and chatbot developers who want to increase the safety and credibility of health chatbot systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.