Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41393844›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Quality evaluation of information about sudden sensorineural hearing loss on TikTok videos: Cross-sectional study.

Tianyi Ni, Yun Jiang, Yuehong Liu, Jing Zhou, Hongbo Xie, Siyi Yang, Jian Ruan, Dandan Guo, Ziyuan Lin, Zhao Han

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tianyi NiDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Huadong Hospital affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6460-4047
Yun JiangDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Huadong Hospital affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yuehong LiuDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Huadong Hospital affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jing ZhouDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Huadong Hospital affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Hongbo XieDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Huadong Hospital affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Siyi YangDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Huadong Hospital affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jian RuanDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Huadong Hospital affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Dandan GuoDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Huadong Hospital affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Ziyuan LinDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Huadong Hospital affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Zhao HanDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Huadong Hospital affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) has increasingly become a critical public health concern worldwide, with limited access to health knowledge among Chinese patients. TikTok is considered one of the most popular short-video platforms for health education information in China. However, there remains a lack of scientific investigation and evaluation for the quality of these videos. Objective: The study aimed to examine the quality and content coverage of the short videos about SSNHL on TikTok as one of the most significant information sources for Chinese. Methods: We retrieved 215 TikTok videos by comprehensive ranking with the Chinese search term "SSNHL" on 1 June 2025. Video sources, audience engagement, and video content were extracted. Two independent researchers evaluated the information of each video using m-DISCERN, Global Quality Score (GQS), Goobie's coding scheme, Results: A total of 174 TikTok videos were ultimately included, 157 from healthcare, and 17 from nonhealthcare. The median video lengths were 50 s (healthcare) and 70 s (nonhealthcare). Videos from healthcare source gained higher overall audience engagement except comments. The majority of the video style was medical questions and answers (51.7%), while the most common video background was medical scenario (90.3%). Video uploaders were predominantly from first-tier cities (45.4%). Videos from healthcare showed more scores on the median m-DISCERN, GQS, JAMA, and VIQI than videos from nonhealthcare. The GQS and VIQI score positively correlated with metrics such as likes, shares and collections ( Conclusion: Videos from healthcare performed better than nonhealthcare, at the video quality of SSNHL-related knowledge. However, the overall quality and content coverage from both sources were unsatisfying. Despite some limited positive correlations between video quality and audience engagement, it suggests that individuals should be vigilant when discerning health-related information on TikTok.

Indexed as

Goobie's coding schemeGQSinformationJAMA benchmarksm-DISCERNqualityshort videossudden sensorineural hearing lossTikTokVIQI

Identifiers

PMID41393844
PMCPMC12699002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.