ArticleDigital health
Human-AI collaboration for prehospital trauma triage: Designing the On Scene Injury Severity Prediction (OSISP) model as a clinical decision support system.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to advance the On Scene Injury Severity Prediction (OSISP), an Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based model, as a Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) that supports Emergency Medical Service (EMS) personnel during on-scene assessment of adult trauma patients. The objectives are to explore the integration of OSISP with the prehospital trauma workflow and to refine the User Interface (UI) that communicates the predictions. Methods: Workflow integration was studied in a workshop by analysis of a customer journey map created by personnel with experience of working in the EMS setting ( Results: The workshop derived that OSISP is a service to be used on portable IT platforms as a second opinion, support for prioritization, and support during patient assessment. The literature reviews identified key content, characteristics, and goals of communicating predictions to users. The refined UI consisted of eight information components (prediction, entered predictors, missing predictors, and model details), and four functions (notification, exploration mode, and filtering of top three entered and missing predictors), to communicate the OSISP prediction. Conclusions: The refined OSISP UI has potential to integrate well into the clinical workflow during patient assessment, as well as enhance human-AI collaboration through customizable information when communicating predictions. However, usability testing of the OSISP UI is needed to ensure clinical utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.