Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41393842›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Human-AI collaboration for prehospital trauma triage: Designing the On Scene Injury Severity Prediction (OSISP) model as a clinical decision support system.

Anna Bakidou, Magnus Andersson Hagiwara, Eunji Lee, Eva-Corina Caragounis, Bengt Arne Sjöqvist, Mattias Seth, Anders Jonsson, Stefan Candefjord

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anna BakidouDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4288-8146
Magnus Andersson HagiwaraPreHospen - Center for Prehospital Research, Faculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare, University of Borås, Borås, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6888-9323
Eunji LeeDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8369-7736
Eva-Corina CaragounisDepartment of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg and Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5637-2637
Bengt Arne SjöqvistDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6564-737X
Mattias SethDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3737-3316
Anders JonssonPreHospen - Center for Prehospital Research, Faculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare, University of Borås, Borås, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7928-7021
Stefan CandefjordDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7942-2190

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to advance the On Scene Injury Severity Prediction (OSISP), an Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based model, as a Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) that supports Emergency Medical Service (EMS) personnel during on-scene assessment of adult trauma patients. The objectives are to explore the integration of OSISP with the prehospital trauma workflow and to refine the User Interface (UI) that communicates the predictions. Methods: Workflow integration was studied in a workshop by analysis of a customer journey map created by personnel with experience of working in the EMS setting ( Results: The workshop derived that OSISP is a service to be used on portable IT platforms as a second opinion, support for prioritization, and support during patient assessment. The literature reviews identified key content, characteristics, and goals of communicating predictions to users. The refined UI consisted of eight information components (prediction, entered predictors, missing predictors, and model details), and four functions (notification, exploration mode, and filtering of top three entered and missing predictors), to communicate the OSISP prediction. Conclusions: The refined OSISP UI has potential to integrate well into the clinical workflow during patient assessment, as well as enhance human-AI collaboration through customizable information when communicating predictions. However, usability testing of the OSISP UI is needed to ensure clinical utility.

Indexed as

Artificial Intelligence (AI)Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS)customer journey mapdigital healtheXplainable AI (XAI)field triagehuman–AI collaborationOn Scene Injury Severity Prediction (OSISP)prehospital careservice designtrauma

Identifiers

PMID41393842
PMCPMC12701220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.