ArticleSSM. Qualitative research in health2025
Examining access to gender-affirming surgery: A community-based thematic analysis of structural and systemic barriers and supports.
Article in SSM. Qualitative research in health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Experiences of Transgender and Gender Diverse Patients in Accessing Gender-Affirming Chest Masculinization: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Thematic Synthesis of the Literature.Plastic surgery (Oakville, Ont.) · 2026Review
- Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Utilization of Top and Bottom Gender Affirming Surgeries Among Eligible Transgender Adults.Plastic surgery (Oakville, Ont.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objectives: To identify and explore the barriers and facilitators to accessing gender-affirming surgery (GAS) for transgender and gender-diverse individuals (TGDI) using a community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach. This study aims to assess the impact of structural, social, and systemic factors on the accessibility of GAS and to highlight key facilitators that improve healthcare access and overall well-being for TGDI individuals. Methods: Thematic analysis of focus groups was performed to identify barriers and facilitators experienced by the participants in accessing this care. Results: 35 TGDI (9 Trans Women, 8 Trans Men, 5 Non-binary individuals, and one person identifying as other) were Conclusion: This study highlights how TGDI face compounded barriers to GAS, including the emotional burden of navigating insurance and WPATH criteria, gatekeeping, and identity erasure. Community networks-especially chosen families and peer knowledge-sharing-emerged as critical facilitators. Beyond increasing representation, findings point to the need for reforming eligibility pathways, provider training in trauma-informed care, and investment in community-based infrastructures that already support access.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.