ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
The Rapid Naming Test: Neuroanatomical validity and clinical utility.
Article in Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Rapid Naming Test: Neuroanatomical validity and clinical utility.Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe Rapid Naming Test (RNT) is a tablet-administered confrontation naming task. We evaluated its concurrent validity, neuroanatomical correlates, sensitivity to cognitive impairment, and discriminant validity across neurodegenerative syndromes.
methodsWe compared RNT performance of 263 healthy adults (mean [SD] age = 73.6 [9.3]; 60.5% female) and 185 people with neurodegenerative syndromes (mean [SD] age = 68.3 [9.0]; 38.9% female), including primary progressive aphasias (PPA). RNT performance were correlated with traditional cognitive test performance and with regional gray matter volumes using voxel-based morphometry.
resultsRNT performance was associated with language, memory, executive function, and processing speed ( DISCUSSION: The RNT is sensitive to cognitive impairment and associated with brain regions involved in language and cognitive control, with left hemisphere predominance. Highlights: The Rapid Naming Test (RNT) is a 1-min tablet-based confrontation naming task.The pattern of performance across clinical cohorts supports the construct validity of the RNT.RNT performance was associated with gray matter volumes in regions important for object recognition and semantic knowledge.Age adjusted norms of the RNT were sensitive to mild cognitive impairment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.