Article... International web for all conference. Web for All Conference2025
Joint Bilingual Navigation of Informed Consent and Intake Forms in American Sign Language and Written English.
Article in ... International web for all conference. Web for All Conference, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
People who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing (DHH) experience significant health disparities primarily due to barriers in communication accessibility. Approximately 500,000 individuals in the United States primarily use American Sign Language (ASL) and frequently encounter difficulties with informed consent or intake forms that are presented exclusively in written English rather than their native language. Recent advancements in machine learning for Individual Sign Language Recognition (ISLR)-the translation of individual ASL signs-provide an opportunity to develop fully bilingual forms in both ASL and written English. These bilingual forms have significant potential in healthcare and employment contexts, ensuring comprehensive accessibility for Deaf signers fluent in ASL and hearing intake personnel fluent in English. We propose the concept of "joint bilingual navigation," which allows users to interact with digital forms either by signing into a camera-equipped device or through touchscreen interaction with written English. In this paper, we evaluate a bilingual informed consent and intake form that simultaneously supports navigation via natural ASL signs and traditional touchscreen input. Our user studies assessed interest and usability among Deaf signers and hearing non-signing intake staff, particularly focusing on obtaining informed consent and signatures from Deaf participants. The results indicate that such bilingual approaches are effective and positively received. These findings have broader implications, demonstrating that similar bilingual navigation techniques can be applied effectively in other domains requiring inclusive and accessible interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.