ArticleSpine surgery and related research2025
Postoperative Deterioration of Sagittal Balance in Adult Spinal Deformities: Influence of Preoperative Alignment and Pelvic Incidence.
Article in Spine surgery and related research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Research progress on sagittal balance and minimal clinically important difference after two-level lumbar spondylolisthesis surgery.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study aimed to identify the factors associated with the postoperative deterioration of sagittal balance after surgery for adult spinal deformity (ASD), focusing on preoperative alignment and pelvic incidence (PI). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 87 patients who underwent corrective surgery for ASD (2017-2020). Sagittal balance was assessed using the sagittal balance classification (SBC). The patients were classified as balanced (maintained SBC grade 1 or 2) or imbalanced (deteriorated to grade 3). Radiographic parameters, clinical outcomes (Japanese Orthopedics Association scores and mechanical complications), and bone mineral density were analyzed. Results: In 15 patients (17.2%), the sagittal balance deteriorated to grade 3 (imbalanced group). Factors significantly associated with postoperative deterioration of sagittal balance included preoperative grade 3 SBC (73.3% vs. 23.6%, p<0.001), steroid use (26.7% vs. 2.8%, p<0.01), pelvic fusion (80% vs. 51.4%, p=0.049), higher preoperative PI, sacral slope, and sagittal vertical axis. At 2 years, the imbalanced group showed a significantly greater corrective loss of the lumbar spine. Receiver operating curve analysis identified preoperative PI ≥52.1° as predictive of postoperative imbalance (sensitivity 86.7%, specificity 66.7%). The clinical outcomes were similar, but the reoperation rates were higher in the imbalanced group (20.0% vs. 2.8%, p=0.03). Conclusions: High preoperative PI, severe sagittal imbalance, steroid use, and pelvic fusion were predictive of postoperative sagittal balance deterioration, underscoring the need for personalized preoperative planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.