ArticleSpine surgery and related research2025
Anterolateral versus Transpedicular Decompression with Posterior Instrumentation: A Randomized Prospective Study in Paradiscal Thoracic Spine Tuberculosis.
Article in Spine surgery and related research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Multi-Segment Thoracolumbar Tuberculosis Treated Through the Posterior "Detour Method" Versus the Combined Anterior-Posterior Approach: A Technique Note and Preliminary Retrospective Study.Orthopaedic surgery · 2026Article
- Critical Appraisal of "Anterolateral Versus Transpedicular Decompression with Posterior Instrumentation: A Randomized Prospective Study in Paradiscal Thoracic Spine Tuberculosis."Spine surgery and related research · 2026Article
- Critical appraisal of Anterolateral versus Transpedicular Decompression with Posterior Instrumentation: A Randomized Prospective Study in Paradiscal Thoracic Spine Tuberculosis.Spine surgery and related research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Surgical decompression is necessary for anterior paradiscal-type thoracic spine tuberculosis with a neurological deficit; nevertheless, if pedicle screw fixation is unsuccessful, laminectomy may result in pan-vertebral instability. No available studies compare traditional anterolateral decompression (ALD) with the convenient, less extensive technique of transpedicular decompression (TPD). Methods: This randomized comparative study of 20 cases of thoracic spine tuberculosis (T2-T12) used a posterior midline surgical approach with pedicle screw instrumentation. Diseased pedicle removal by eggshell technique (TPD) was compared with decompression by removal of the posterior part of the rib, transverse process, pedicle, and posterolateral part of the diseased vertebral body (ALD). Results: Both groups had similar lengths of skin incision, intraoperative blood loss, and blood transfusion, but the duration of surgery was significantly less (p-value 0.019) in the TPD (156.5 minutes) than in the ALD group (184.5 minutes). Additional hemi-laminotomy was needed in two cases of TP, in the absence of liquid pus. Both groups showed similar neurological recovery except for one case of multidrug resistance in the ALD group. Improvements in the modified Japanese Orthopedics Association score (p=0.719); visual analog scale (p=0.259) and Nurick scale (p=0.387) had no statistical difference between the two groups. Mean kyphosis correction of 6.64 Conclusions: Similar outcomes of both approaches. TPD is quicker but may need hemi-laminotomy in the absence of liquid pus. ALD enables thick organized pus removal without compromising lamina in paradiscal-tuberculosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.