ArticleSpine surgery and related research2025
Integration of Virtual Reality Headsets into Endoscopic Spine Surgery: Insights from a Cadaveric Lab and Multicenter Surgeon Survey.
Article in Spine surgery and related research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Endoscopic spine surgery (ESS) presents advantages over traditional microscopic techniques but faces limitations in terms of field of view and depth perception. Virtual reality (VR) devices offer solutions by integrating real-time digital images into the surgical field, enabling magnification and teleproctoring. Methods: The study was conducted in two phases. In the first phase, 55 surgeons completed a pre-use questionnaire. In the second phase, 19 surgeons participated in cadaveric practical training using the device and completed a post-use survey. Data were analyzed using R software. Results: Following device use, surgeon confidence in magnification increased significantly (from 21% to 57%), with improved perception of image quality. Acceptance of teleproctoring rose from 33% to 94.7%. The device was considered superior to the operating microscope in both image quality and ergonomics. Conclusions: VR head-mounted devices enhance visualization in ESS, allow intraoperative access to imaging, and support remote guidance via teleproctoring. Their adoption may contribute to improved training, planning, and surgeon ergonomics. However, additional controlled studies are required to determine their effects on clinical outcomes and operative performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.