Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41393770›Full record

ArticleSpine surgery and related research2025

Anatomical Variants of the C6 and C7 Transverse Processes: Hidden Risk Factors in Ultrasound-Guided Cervical Nerve Root Blocks.

Aozora Kadono, Shizumasa Murata, Hiroshi Iwasaki, Hiroshi Hashizume, Shunji Tsutsui, Masanari Takami, Keiji Nagata, Yuyu Ishimoto, Masatoshi Teraguchi, Yoshimasa Mera and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Spine surgery and related research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Aozora KadonoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Shingu Municipal Medical Center, Shingu, Japan.
Shizumasa MurataDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Hiroshi IwasakiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Hiroshi HashizumeDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Shunji TsutsuiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Masanari TakamiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Keiji NagataDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Yuyu IshimotoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Masatoshi TeraguchiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Yoshimasa MeraDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Shingu Municipal Medical Center, Shingu, Japan.
Hiroki IwahashiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Shingu Municipal Medical Center, Shingu, Japan.
Kimihide MurakamiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Shingu Municipal Medical Center, Shingu, Japan.
Ryo TaijiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Takuhei KozakiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Ryuichiro NakanishiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Yoji KitanoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Shingu Municipal Medical Center, Shingu, Japan.
Hiroshi YamadaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Ultrasound-guided cervical nerve root block (US-CNRB) is increasingly recognized as a safer alternative to fluoroscopy-guided procedures for treating cervical radiculopathy, owing to its ability to visualize neural and vascular structures in real time and to avoid exposure to radiation and contrast media. However, its clinical adoption remains limited due to concerns regarding inadvertent vascular puncture and misidentification of cervical levels. This study focuses on anatomical anomalies at the C6 and C7 levels, which are critical to the accuracy and safety of US-CNRB, and investigates the prevalence of morphological variations using cervical computed tomography (CT). Methods: This retrospective observational study included patients who underwent cervical CT between April 2018 and March 2020. Patients with tumors, rheumatoid arthritis, infectious spondylitis, destructive spondyloarthropathy, or a history of cervical spine surgery were excluded. Axial and sagittal CT images were analyzed to assess two specific anatomical variants: absence of the anterior tubercle at C6 and presence of the anterior tubercle at C7. Two board-certified orthopedic spine surgeons independently assessed the images. Descriptive statistics and Cohen's kappa coefficient were used for analysis, with a p<0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: We included 671 patients (359 females, 312 males; mean age: 62.1 years). Anatomical variants were observed in 1.34% (9/671) of cases: absence of the anterior tubercle at the C6 vertebra in 0.45% and presence of the anterior tubercle at C7 in 0.89%. No patient had both anomalies. Interobserver agreement was high, with disagreement in only one case. The Cohen's kappa coefficient for interobserver reliability was 0.97. Conclusions: Although rare, anatomical anomalies at C6 and C7 can obscure critical landmarks during US-CNRB, increasing the risk of level misidentification and procedural errors. Recognizing these variants through preprocedural imaging is essential to improve the safety and precision of cervical spine interventions.

Indexed as

cervical transverse process morphologycervical vertebraesafety of cervical interventionsspinal Nerve Rootultrasound-guided cervical nerve root block

Identifiers

PMID41393770
PMCPMC12696461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.