ArticleSpine surgery and related research2025
Anatomical Variants of the C6 and C7 Transverse Processes: Hidden Risk Factors in Ultrasound-Guided Cervical Nerve Root Blocks.
Article in Spine surgery and related research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Ultrasound-guided cervical nerve root block (US-CNRB) is increasingly recognized as a safer alternative to fluoroscopy-guided procedures for treating cervical radiculopathy, owing to its ability to visualize neural and vascular structures in real time and to avoid exposure to radiation and contrast media. However, its clinical adoption remains limited due to concerns regarding inadvertent vascular puncture and misidentification of cervical levels. This study focuses on anatomical anomalies at the C6 and C7 levels, which are critical to the accuracy and safety of US-CNRB, and investigates the prevalence of morphological variations using cervical computed tomography (CT). Methods: This retrospective observational study included patients who underwent cervical CT between April 2018 and March 2020. Patients with tumors, rheumatoid arthritis, infectious spondylitis, destructive spondyloarthropathy, or a history of cervical spine surgery were excluded. Axial and sagittal CT images were analyzed to assess two specific anatomical variants: absence of the anterior tubercle at C6 and presence of the anterior tubercle at C7. Two board-certified orthopedic spine surgeons independently assessed the images. Descriptive statistics and Cohen's kappa coefficient were used for analysis, with a p<0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: We included 671 patients (359 females, 312 males; mean age: 62.1 years). Anatomical variants were observed in 1.34% (9/671) of cases: absence of the anterior tubercle at the C6 vertebra in 0.45% and presence of the anterior tubercle at C7 in 0.89%. No patient had both anomalies. Interobserver agreement was high, with disagreement in only one case. The Cohen's kappa coefficient for interobserver reliability was 0.97. Conclusions: Although rare, anatomical anomalies at C6 and C7 can obscure critical landmarks during US-CNRB, increasing the risk of level misidentification and procedural errors. Recognizing these variants through preprocedural imaging is essential to improve the safety and precision of cervical spine interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.