Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41393720›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Efficiency of Artificial Intelligence in Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Medical Imaging.

Nikhita, Dhyaan Bannur, Maria Gabriela Cerdas, Arisha Zahid Saeed, Bashir Imam, Ravtej Singh Thandi, Anusha H C, Preethi Reddy, Ramsha Ali

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

NikhitaAcute Medicine, Good Hope Hospital, Birmingham, GBR.
Dhyaan BannurBasic Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, USA.
Maria Gabriela CerdasMedicine, Universidad de Ciencias Médicas, San Jose, CRI.
Arisha Zahid SaeedMedicine, Gulf Medical University, Ajman, ARE.
Bashir ImamPediatrics, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Coudersport, USA.
Ravtej Singh ThandiMedicine, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, CHN.
Anusha H CDepartment of Radiology, Kaloji Narayana Rao University of Health Sciences, Warangal, IND.
Preethi ReddyDepartment of Radiology, Kaloji Narayana Rao University of Health Sciences, Warangal, IND.
Ramsha AliMedicine and Surgery, Peoples University of Medical and Health Sciences for Women, Hyderabad, PAK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction is necessary for visualizing complex anatomy and supporting clinical decision-making in radiology. However, traditional techniques often struggle with limitations in scalability, speed, and reproducibility. The recent emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) has enabled a new generation of reconstruction tools that offer greater automation and new clinical capabilities. Motivated by the demand for efficient imaging, researchers have applied deep learning to overcome longstanding barriers, with impacts spanning diagnosis, surgical planning, and disease monitoring. This review included peer-reviewed studies published within the last 10 years, focusing exclusively on adult human imaging published in the English language, as anatomical development, imaging protocols, and clinical decision pathways differ significantly in pediatric populations. While this improved applicability to adult radiology, it limited insight into emerging pediatric and preclinical research. Searches focused on AI-driven 3D reconstruction across different radiologic modalities. Articles were selected based on the following predefined inclusion criteria: adult human participants, AI-based 3D reconstruction, clinical validation, and relevance to radiologic practice. Studies including pediatric or animal subjects, preclinical-only experimentation, non-English-language text, or without applied clinical evaluation were excluded. Our results showed that AI has improved the accuracy, speed, and clinical utility of 3D reconstruction in multiple specialties. Deep learning models such as U-Net, V-Net, DenseVNet, and generative adversarial networks have achieved high segmentation accuracy, often reporting Dice scores >0.90. These models have also been used for tumor detection, surgical planning, and reducing radiation exposure. However, challenges such as high computational requirements, lack of standardized datasets, limited real-world validation, and ethical concerns remain. In conclusion, 3D reconstruction is transforming radiology with more accurate patient-specific images for improved clinical decision-making. While it is rapidly being integrated into practice, these technologies still have limitations that need to be addressed. Nonetheless, with improved and ongoing innovation, AI has the potential to become a catalyst for precise imaging and patient care.

Indexed as

3d reconstructionai in medical imagingartificial intelligence (ai)ct and mriimage segmentationoncology imagingradiologytechnology in healthcare

Identifiers

PMID41393720
PMCPMC12699282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.