Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41393713›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Hemisection of Grossly-Decayed Teeth With Socket Preservation: A Case Report.

Deepika Deepika, Mutiur Rahman, Mohan Rawat, Ajay Nagpal, Shivendra Choudhary

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Deepika DeepikaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Patna, Patna, IND.
Mutiur RahmanDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Kanti Devi Dental College & Hospital, Mathura, IND.
Mohan RawatDepartment of Periodontology and Implantology, Kanti Devi Dental College & Hospital, Mathura, IND.
Ajay NagpalDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Kanti Devi Dental College & Hospital, Mathura, IND.
Shivendra ChoudharyDentistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Patna, Patna, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hemisection of a molar is a surgical procedure involving the removal or separation of one root together with its corresponding portion of the crown. This approach allows for the preservation of the remaining tooth structure and surrounding alveolar bone, while providing support for subsequent fixed prosthetic rehabilitation. The present case report describes the successful application of hemisection to retain a severely compromised mandibular first molar with periodontal and periapical involvement. Following prosthetic rehabilitation, the treatment achieved a favourable outcome. Through meticulous case selection, careful treatment planning, and precise surgical execution, the adverse consequences associated with tooth loss were effectively avoided.

Indexed as

bone graftcrown lengtheningdecayed teethextraction socket preservationhemisectionsocket preservationsubgingival caries

Identifiers

PMID41393713
PMCPMC12699502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.