ArticleCureus2025
Rapid Desensitization to Reslizumab in an 80-Year-Old Woman With Chronic Eosinophilic Pneumonia, Severe Persistent Asthma, and Chronic Urticaria.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Our patient is an 80-year-old woman with chronic eosinophilic pneumonia (CEP), chronic urticaria (CU), severe persistent asthma (SPA), long-term oral corticosteroid therapy, and a resected papillary thyroid carcinoma. The patient had normal, stable immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels across all treatments ranging from 16 to 37 IU/mL. In treating her CEP and severe asthma, she trialed monoclonal antibody therapy with mepolizumab, benralizumab, dupilumab, and omalizumab, which were each begun and then discontinued successively due to severe side effects or allergic reaction. However, reslizumab offered 10 months of notable relief from urticaria and dyspnea without oral corticosteroids but was discontinued after the patient developed infusion-associated urticaria. Given her relief with reslizumab, we planned to desensitize her to this medication via a stepwise, slowed infusion up to a target therapeutic dose. Complete vital signs and physical exam looking for symptoms of an allergic response, including angioedema, urticaria, dyspnea, and nausea, were performed every 15 minutes. Our patient was successfully desensitized to reslizumab at a target dose of 195 mg over three hours. Vitals were checked every 15 minutes, which were within normal limits throughout. Further, she was monitored for any symptoms of allergic reaction, including angioedema, nausea, urticaria, and dyspnea, and denied any complaints throughout the procedure. Our patient reported notable relief of dyspnea and fatigue at two weeks and four weeks post-procedure. As opposed to a decrease in dose or discontinuation of treatment, patients may undergo rapid desensitization through a stepwise, slowed infusion rate to better tolerate a previously allergenic medication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.