ArticleCureus2025
A Quality Improvement Initiative of Standard 1 of the British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma (BOAST) for Management of Supracondylar Fractures in Children.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSupracondylar humeral fractures are the most common elbow injuries in children and carry a high risk of neurovascular compromise. The British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma (BOAST) recommend thorough documentation of vascular and nerve assessment in every case.
objectiveTo evaluate compliance with BOAST Standard 1 for neurovascular documentation in paediatric supracondylar fractures at a large NHS hospital trust.
methodsA retrospective cohort audit of 44 patients between January and May 2022 was performed. Neurovascular documentation, imaging practices, and adherence to BOAST criteria were assessed from e-Trauma and PACS (Picture Archiving and Communication System) records. Statistical analysis was carried out using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 24 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).
resultsForty-four paediatric patients with supracondylar fractures were included (mean age 7.4 years, 61% male). Extension-type fractures accounted for 93%, with Gartland Types I, II, and III representing 30% (n=13), 43% (n=19), and 27% (n=12), respectively. Only 10% (n=4) of patients had detailed nerve function documented, while 40 (90%) were recorded as "neurovascular intact." Radial artery status was missing in 25 (57%) cases, and capillary refill time was not recorded in 14 (32%). Post-cast X-rays were obtained in 29 (66%) patients, but 12 (28%) were discharged in a cast without imaging. Overall, compliance with BOAST Standard 1 was poor.
conclusionCompliance with BOAST Standard 1 was poor, especially in the documentation of nerve and vascular status. This represents a significant patient safety concern. Educational interventions and structured proformas are required to improve adherence and should be followed by re-audit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.