ReviewCureus2025
Effectiveness of AI-Based Tools in Detecting Diabetic Retinopathy in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review of Diagnostic Performance and Implementation Feasibility.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Primary Liver Cancer Trends Worldwide and in China: Analysis of GLOBOCAN 2022 Data and Disease Management Implications.Portal hypertension & cirrhosis · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a leading cause of preventable blindness worldwide, with a disproportionate impact in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Artificial intelligence (AI) offers a potential means to address workforce and infrastructure gaps that limit access to DR screening in these settings, but evidence on its performance and feasibility remains scattered. A systematic review of studies published between January 2015 and June 2025 was conducted using six databases. Eligible studies evaluated AI, machine learning, or deep learning applied to retinal imaging for DR detection and reported quantitative diagnostic or implementation outcomes, while studies limited to high-income countries or non-original research were excluded. Only a small number of eligible studies were identified. Across these, AI-based tools generally showed high diagnostic accuracy and were feasible to implement in resource-limited environments. Early evidence suggested potential benefits, such as reduced screening costs, decreased clinician workload, and improved patient follow-up, though reporting on infrastructure needs, regulatory considerations, and long-term sustainability was limited. Overall, AI-based tools show promise for scaling DR screening in LMICs, with encouraging indications of good accuracy and operational efficiency, but further large-scale and implementation-focused research is required to guide their integration into health systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.