ArticleCureus2025
Prevalence and Associated Factors of Sharps Injury Amongst Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The silent normalization of biological exposures in operating rooms: an overlooked occupational crisis.Patient safety in surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSharps injuries remain a prevalent occupational hazard for nurses, with implications for both physical and psychological health. Even minor injuries can lead to heightened anxiety due to the potential risk of infection.
aimThis study aimed to assess the prevalence of sharps injuries and identify associated risk factors among nurses in a tertiary care hospital setting. MATERIALS AND
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted from September to November 2023 among 339 nurses employed at a public sector, tertiary care teaching hospital in Bihar, India. Participants were selected using a convenience sampling method. Data were collected through a structured, self-administered questionnaire distributed via a Google Form. Both descriptive and inferential statistical analyses were employed.
resultsThe prevalence of sharps injuries among participants was 8.84%. Injuries were more frequently reported in high-demand units and during tasks involving the preparation or use of medical devices.
conclusionThe overall prevalence of sharps injuries was relatively low. However, the findings underscore the importance of targeted safety interventions. Implementing unit-specific precautions and enhancing biomedical waste management practices are essential to improving occupational safety and reducing injury risks among nurses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.