Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41393593›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Prediction of Stature From Percutaneous Anthropometric Dimensions of the Femur and Tibia Among Adult Nigerians.

Ahmed A Salawu, James O Ikpa, Maryam O Raji-Salawu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ahmed A SalawuDepartment of Anatomy, College of Medicine, University of Lagos, Lagos, NGA.
James O IkpaDepartment of Anatomy, College of Medicine, University of Lagos, Lagos, NGA.
Maryam O Raji-SalawuDepartment of Family Medicine, Palliative Care Unit, Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Lagos, NGA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEstimating stature, sex, ancestry, and age is central to forensic anthropological profiling, underpinning human identification in medico-legal contexts and mass-casualty events. Skeletal analysis informs these components. Although widely established in developed settings, Nigeria and many developing countries lack robust forensic anthropometric datasets despite rising disaster rates. This study sought to derive population‑specific regression equations to estimate stature from percutaneous femoral and tibial measurements in Nigerians. Regression analysis has proven to be the most straightforward and dependable approach for estimating stature.

methodsThis cross‑sectional observational study was conducted among 255 healthy Nigerian adults (130 males, 125 females; 18-65 years) recruited by stratified random sampling from the University of Lagos and Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Lagos, Nigeria, following ethical approval (approval number: CMUL/HREC/0955/19). Stature, femoral length, tibial length, and femoral bi‑epicondylar width were measured using standardized International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry (ISAK) protocols with calibrated instruments (SECA™ stadiometer (Hamburg, Germany), Rosscraft calipers (Campbell, Canada), and Mitutoyo vernier calipers (Kawasaki, Japan). All measurements were taken by a single investigator at fixed times to minimize bias; intra‑observer reliability was assessed by triplicate readings, with mean values recorded. Bilateral measurements were averaged, and outliers were excluded if attributable to error or implausibility. Data were analyzed in IBM SPSS Statistics software, version 25 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY) after normality and regression assumptions were verified, and sex‑specific and pooled regression models were developed to predict stature.

resultsThe mean height of males was higher than females, reflecting clear sexual dimorphism in stature. Regression analysis demonstrated strong, statistically significant correlations between stature and femoral/tibial dimensions in both sexes. The pooled models yielded high coefficients of determination (R²) with low standard errors of estimate, indicating good predictive accuracy, with tibial length emerging as the most reliable predictor of stature, offering the greatest accuracy across both sexes (males standard error of estimate (SEE) ± 5.08 cm; females SEE ± 16.02 cm), whereas femoral intercondylar width contributed little to predictive value.

conclusionThis study establishes a significant correlation between lower limb dimensions and stature, aligning with trends reported in other groups. The dataset generated offers a valuable forensic reference to aid human identification, particularly in contexts involving fragmented or mutilated remains. By providing population‑specific standards, this work enhances the application of lower‑limb metrics in forensic practice within Nigeria. There is a need to broaden research across diverse Nigerian ethnic groups, conduct cross-validation on skeletal remains, and integrate advanced analytical tools to enhance applicability. Also, incorporating artificial intelligence and computational modelling offers further potential to refine accuracy and strengthen cross‑validation of regression models.

Indexed as

anthropometryfemurregression modelsstaturetibia

Identifiers

PMID41393593
PMCPMC12698193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.