Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41393591›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

An Ethical Reflection on Assisted Dying, Inequity Within Palliative Medicine Services and Access to Care in the United Kingdom: A Resident Doctor's Perspective.

Morgan W Hayden

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Morgan W HaydenInternal Medicine, The Grange University Hospital, Cwmbran, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the passing of the Assisting Dying Act in the United Kingdom, there are growing concerns from within and outside the Palliative Care community. The conflicting ethical issues at play are complex and often contradictory. I present a short summary of several ethical issues and a narrative argument in opposition to assisted dying in our current system, citing autonomy, beneficence, arguments of justice, inequity and a rights-based approach. Overall, I will argue that the disparity between availability and demand for access to specialist palliative care creates an inequitable playing field for patients and clinicians and that until equitable access to palliative care is established, patients are at risk of being consented for assisted dying without access to a viable and evidence-based alternative.

Indexed as

active and passive euthanasiaassisted dyingend of life and hospice caremedical ethicspalliative medicine research

Identifiers

PMID41393591
PMCPMC12697379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.