ArticleCureus2025
Combined Treatment of Hyperbaric Oxygen and Anti-vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy in Cilioretinal Artery Occlusion Associated With Central Retinal Vein Occlusion.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We report a case of a male in his early 40s who presented with transient episodes of visual blurring and was initially diagnosed with isolated cilioretinal artery occlusion (CLRAO). Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HOT) was initiated on the same day as the onset of the preceding episode, and six sessions had been completed when he was first examined at our department. Despite ongoing HOT, he developed worsening signs of venous stasis. Further investigation confirmed CLRAO secondary to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) and revealed heterozygosity for the factor V Leiden mutation. HOT was continued for two weeks, and a single intravitreal injection of bevacizumab (anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF)) was administered, resulting in full and sustained anatomical and functional recovery, with visual acuity improving from 8/10 to 10/10. This case supports the benefit of anti-VEGF therapy in combined CLRAO and CRVO without exudative or neovascular complications, by promoting vasoconstriction and reducing venous permeability. It also suggests a synergistic effect with HOT by further lowering retinal venous pressure through distinct mechanisms. These findings highlight the potential benefit of addressing both retinal hypoxia and venous hypertension through the combined use of HOT and anti-VEGF therapy in selected cases of mixed retinal vascular occlusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.