ArticleCureus2025
Surgical Hand Scrubbing: A Clinical Audit at a Referral Hospital.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Surgical site infections (SSIs) continue to be a serious challenge in the medical profession, particularly in developing countries, where they are responsible for a notable percentage of hospital-acquired infections. Although proper hand hygiene continues to be a mainstay for the prevention of SSIs, compliance by surgical teams tends to be less than optimal. Factors such as limited time, inadequate training, and resource constraints are among the reasons behind this persisting problem. This study critically examines and seeks to improve compliance with surgical hand scrubbing protocols at Prince Osman Digna Referral Hospital and referencing standards established by the World Health Organization (WHO). Methods The study employed a three-cycle observational cross-sectional audit conducted from October to December 2024, with each cycle comprising 30 recorded observations. The first cycle established baseline compliance. Following this, targeted interventions, such as instructional videos, practical training sessions, and direct feedback, were introduced. In the next cycle, adherence is re-evaluated. Then, in the final cycle, the same interventions were repeated and reinforced through in-person live demonstrations. Data collection relied on the use of a systematic checklist, allowing for the quantitative analysis of compliance rates and the qualitative identification of barriers to adherence. Results Following the introduction of training and feedback, compliance with hand hygiene protocols increased from 82% to 96% between the last two cycles. The most significant improvement was seen within a minimum time of two minutes during scrubbing, rising by 166%. On the other sites, for instance, drying hands and forearms with a sterile towel also improved significantly, from 30% to 42.8%. Overall, these findings highlight the incredible impact that organized education and ongoing feedback can have on following proper hand hygiene protocols. Conclusion Interventions targeted at education resulted in notable gains in adherence to surgical hand scrubbing protocols, thereby enhancing infection control measures. These findings highlight the effectiveness of structured training. That said, relying on one-off initiatives isn't enough. Sustained educational efforts and long-term strategies are needed to maintain compliance and achieve further reductions in SSIs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.