ArticleBioinformation2025
Revolutionizing root canal treatment: A review of minimally invasive endodontics.
Article in Bioinformation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Minimally invasive endodontics (MIE) is an emerging approach in root canal therapy that emphasizes preserving as much tooth structure as possible while maintaining effective disinfection, which is essential for achieving long-term clinical success. Therefore, it is of interest to review the biomechanical and clinical outcomes of minimally invasive endodontics (MIE) in comparison to conventional endodontic techniques, while also addressing the efficacy of instrumentation, canal debridement and fracture resistance within these approaches. Additionally, emerging treatment modalities such as three-dimensional guided endodontics and enhanced irrigation protocols have been explored. Data shows that MIE is a promising strategy for preserving both the form and function of the tooth. However, further clinical studies are needed to standardize protocols and confirm long-term success rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.