ArticleBioinformation2025
Air-conducted ocular vestibular-evoked potential.
Article in Bioinformation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potential (O-VEMP) test can have great clinical value if potential influences of stimulus characteristics are known. Therefore, it is of interest to examine the effects of different variables on O-VEMP responses by delivering air-conducted sound stimuli in the form of tone bursts and clicks in sitting and supine positions in healthy participants. Total 60 healthy participants in the age range of 18-60 years were investigated and statistical analysis was performed to find the variations in O-VEMP responses (p-value of <0.05 was considered as significant). Tone burst stimuli resulted in larger amplitudes (p=0.005, p = 0.0008) and lower thresholds (p = 0.005, p=0.03), for right and left ear respectively, while supine position produced larger O-VEMP amplitudes as compared to those in sitting position (p<0.001). Potential influence of stimuli, recording conditions, age and gender on O-VEMP response should be borne in mind during clinical interpretation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.