Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41393444›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2025

Advancing precision: The role of digital workflows in modern implant dentistry.

Puneet Prasher, Anjali Tuteja, Falguni Amin, Resilda Sopaj, Diptansh Tuteja, Hasan Sharaf Eddin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Puneet PrasherDepartment of Dental Surgery in Prosthodontics and Crown & Bridge, Sri Guru Ram Das Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Punjab, India.
Anjali TutejaDepartment of Dental Surgery, Genesis Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Ferozpur, Punjab, India.
Falguni AminDeparment of Dental Surgery, Karnavati School of Dentistry, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India.
Resilda SopajIntegrated Second Level in Dentistry, Dental Doctor, University of Tirana, Faculty of Medicine, Tirana, Albania.
Diptansh TutejaDepartment of Dental Surgery, Genesis Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Ferozpur, Punjab, India.
Hasan Sharaf EddinDepartment of Dental Surgery, Near East University, Northern Cyprus, Lefkoşa, Cyprus.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital workflows have transformed implant dentistry by enhancing precision, predictability and patient outcomes through advanced imaging, computer-aided design/manufacturing and guided surgery. Therefore, it is of interest to review the key components of digital workflows, including 3D imaging, virtual treatment planning, dynamic navigation and CAD/CAM-fabricated prostheses. Clinical evidence demonstrates improved implant placement accuracy, reduced treatment times and enhanced aesthetics with digital integration. Challenges such as cost, learning curve and technology adoption are also discussed. Hence, there is a need for continued innovation and wider implementation to optimize implant dentistry practices.

Indexed as

3D printing in dentistryArtificial intelligence (AI) in dentistryCAD/CAM dentistryCone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)Digital workflow

Identifiers

PMID41393444
PMCPMC12697450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.