Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41393419›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2025

Interventions for COVID-19 infected antenatal patients using symptom severity of symptom.

Somlina Roy, Rubina Dohare, Alluri Rajyalaxmi, Sachin Parmar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Somlina RoyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology Amaltas Institute of Medical Sciences, Dewas, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Rubina DohareDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology Government Medical College, Datia, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Alluri RajyalaxmiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology Amaltas Institute of Medical Sciences, Dewas, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Sachin ParmarDepartment of Community Medicine V.K.S. Government Medical College, Neemuch, Madhya Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

SARS-CoV-2 infection among pregnant females is of concern. Therefore, it is of interest to evaluate the demographic characteristics, clinical profiles and outcomes of pregnant women with COVID-19 during two pandemic waves. An ambi-directional observational study was conducted at Gandhi Medical College, Bhopal, over 18 months (Jan 2021-Jun 2022), including 210 COVID-19-positive pregnant women. Data showed that the majority were young, unbooked, ruraland illiterate and from lower socioeconomic backgrounds, with anemia being the most common co-morbidity. The second wave saw increased disease severity, ICU interventions and worse maternal and fetal outcomes, including higher maternal mortality (17.3% vs. 4.4%) and stillbirths (11.5% vs. 6.6%). Timely care, early diagnosis and ICU management are critical to reducing morbidity and mortality.

Indexed as

COVID-19 second wavematernal outcomeneonatal outcome

Identifiers

PMID41393419
PMCPMC12697483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.