Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41393414›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2025

Surface roughness on retention of complete dentures using conventional and digital techniques: An in vitro study.

Neeraja B, Kolla Jaswanth, Ruchira Paul, Chamarthy Kundan Chakravarthy, Priyanka Bansal, Adyasha Mohanty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Neeraja BDepartment of Prosthodontics and Crown & Bridge, The Oxford Dental College, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Kolla JaswanthDepartment of Prosthodontics and Crown & Bridge, The Oxford Dental College, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Ruchira PaulDepartment of Prosthodontics and Crown & Bridge, The Oxford Dental College, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Chamarthy Kundan ChakravarthyDepartment of Prosthodontics and Crown & Bridge, The Oxford Dental College, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Priyanka BansalDepartment of Prosthodontics and Oral Implantology, Dr.D.Y.Patil Dental College and Hospital, Pune, India.
Adyasha MohantyKalinga Institute of Dental Sciences, KIIT, Deemed to be university, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surface roughness of denture bases plays a crucial role in mucosal sealing and biofilm accumulation, directly impacting denture retention. Therefore, it is of interest to evaluate the effect of surface roughness on retention across three fabrication methods: conventional heat-polymerized PMMA, CAD/CAM milling, and 3D printing. Surface roughness and retention forces were measured and analyzed. CAD/CAM-milled dentures showed the smoothest surfaces and highest retention. A strong inverse correlation between roughness and retention was observed.

Indexed as

3D printingCAD/CAM millingDenture retentionPMMAsurface roughness

Identifiers

PMID41393414
PMCPMC12697412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.