Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41393382›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2025

Soumendu Bikash Maiti, Pratima Ngangom, Lalit Narayan Singh, Aaquib Nazir, Manjeet Kumar Shrivastava, Sukhpal Singh, Miral Mehta, Jugajyoti Pathi

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Soumendu Bikash MaitiDepartment of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Government Dental College and Hospital, Jamnagar, Gujarat, India.
Pratima NgangomDepartment of Dental, CHC Kakching, Manipur Health Services, Manipur, India.
Lalit Narayan SinghDepartment of Dentistry, Autonomous State Medical College, Sultanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Aaquib NazirDepartment of Dentistry, SNM District Hospital, Leh, UT Ladakh, India.
Manjeet Kumar ShrivastavaDepartment of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Divya Jyoti College of Dental Science and Research, Modinagar, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Sukhpal SinghDepartment of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Divya Jyoti College of Dental Science and Research, Modinagar, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Miral MehtaDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Karnavati School of Dentistry, Karnavati University, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India.
Jugajyoti PathiDepartment of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Kalinga Institute of Dental Sciences, KIIT Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oral cancer is an international health problem that has few treatment methods and a negative prognosis in late cases. The potential cytotoxicity of laser-ablated gold-silver and copper nanoparticles was considered in this study and the effects were tested on oral squamous cell carcinoma cell lines (SCC-4, CAL-27, KB-3-1) and normal human oral keratinocytes (HOK). The most cytotoxic was gold nanoparticles (IC 50: 38.9-45.1 0g/mL) with a marked selectivity (p < 0.001), causing apoptosis, as which flow cytometry and morphological analysis were confirmed. The statistical results obtained were moderate for silver and copper nanoparticles. These results present laser-ablated gold as a potential oral cancer anticancer agent that is specific.

Indexed as

apoptosisgold nanoparticleslaser ablationnanomedicinecOral squamous cell carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID41393382
PMCPMC12697498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.